|
Winnie
Mar 15, 2005
06:41 GMT
|
Well done anne.
Alex
|
|
Mar 14, 2005 23:59 GMT |
--- End of voting --- |
|
ChefZiggy
Mar 14, 2005
21:51 GMT
|
Abstraction through post work just doesn't meet the spirit of the challenge to me. This is overdone on the post.
|
|
shudder
Mar 14, 2005
18:53 GMT
|
To someone who does not know the ins and outs of post-processing, your image might have a special look to it. However, Twirl is such a one-step manipulation in PS that to many of us in here, the use of this filter might seem a tad bit trite. I am having a hard time getting past that. The blues and yellows do really complement one another and give the image some striking lift.
|
|
timkat
Mar 14, 2005
02:25 GMT
|
hhhmmmm, not sure what to say here. Very cartoonsih.
|
|
BobNSA
Mar 14, 2005
00:32 GMT
|
Beautiful clors and composition. Very creative.
In my top picks
|
|
Sonny Red
Mar 13, 2005
16:16 GMT
|
I picked this as one of my favorites. This challenge seems to be just as challenging for voting as it was for taking the pics. I have been using as my personal criteria, abstract that was in original photo-75%, and photo enhancement 25%. I guess there has been some heated debate on what constitutes photography, and what constitutes PP skills and manipulation. But I picked this pic because I think it was a great concept, and I am giving credit for that. Makes me think how the moon might look being sucked into a black hole....
Great idea and nice work...
|
|
erusan
Mar 13, 2005
02:17 GMT
|
A nice piece of digital art, really striking. Comes the main question:
what is the use of having exposure details with a work of digital art? I am not able to see what job you did on the photography part of the deal, and regardless of the result which is great by the way, what amount of control you were able to exert on the filters used.
So if there were a category for digiart you would have my vote. As for photography, I will not be of any help to your ranking I am afraid...
|
|
Cyn
Mar 12, 2005
15:46 GMT
|
Nice original idea. Pleasing image. I liked it more after I read the background info. I'm undecided on how much weight background info ought to have in my selection process. Still, it's an interesting image.
|
|
tancalvin
Mar 12, 2005
15:38 GMT
|
THis is a great photo with powerful theme and balance of few colours ! Best of luck ....
|
|
ruthemily
Mar 12, 2005
14:31 GMT
|
the photo itself didn't grab me, but i am inspired by the thought process you describe in the notes.
|
|
s7000
Mar 12, 2005
13:00 GMT
|
A very good idea, and the way you were inspired adds to its interest
|
|
pmeek
Mar 11, 2005
21:39 GMT
|
I think the shot of the moon is pretty good, but I didn't really care for the swirling.
|
|
mirel
Mar 11, 2005
20:50 GMT
|
[see (LINK)]
My opinion:
THEME: 3
ORIGINALITY: 3
COMPOSITION: 3
ARTISTIC DEPTH: 3
TECHNICAL & PS: 4
EMOTIONAL IMPACT: 3
|
|
35sur
Mar 11, 2005
12:08 GMT
|
Yet another entry which has gone beyond blurring the boundaries of digital art and photography. I like it, but I don´t think it´s appropriate for a photography challenge.
|
|
Andy Dunn
Mar 11, 2005
02:32 GMT
|
Very creative but more Photoshop than abstract to my eye.
|
|
johnimage
Mar 11, 2005
02:15 GMT
|
Terrific work. I might have added a bit more realism to the moon but, I love the spiral.
|
