|
tripanfal
Mar 7, 2004
00:25 GMT
|
The foreground elements are a bit too dark here. This shot bracketed and layered in PS would be cool. Composition wise I want to see on the other side of the tree to the left...
|
|
nordic
Mar 6, 2004
15:57 GMT
|
good use of foreground and background detail to give the impression of a large distance. Although I would have cropped out all the foliage on the left as it is just distracting to me. The mountains are splendid
|
|
johncomyn
Mar 6, 2004
01:06 GMT
|
This is one of my favourites, some post processing would have done you a lot of justice. I'll vote this one high.
|
|
timkat
Mar 5, 2004
22:15 GMT
|
WOW! Nice framing of the shot with the foreground. Spectacular mountains in the background. You people with mountains like this don't know how lucky you are.. LOL
The only nitpick I have is that a run through neat image would have done wonders.
Well done
|
|
thirties
Mar 5, 2004
21:14 GMT
|
Well done, I know the scene well, you must have used a long lens for this. Good luck
|
|
shudder
Mar 5, 2004
19:08 GMT
|
I like the way you've used the pine trees to develop the left and bottom of the comp, but in doing so , I would have moved Mt. Baker more in to the center of the space left over instgead of jamming the mountain up against the tree on the left as you've done here. That would have made it a more balanced pic. It nneds some post -- most definitely. the pic is rather dark and could use some levels work to bring out the light that is in there, just not evident due to your doing no pp on it. A little curves work would also help with the grayness in the skies. A good effort.
|
|
ChefZiggy
Mar 5, 2004
16:45 GMT
|
Not bad...but the trees in the foreground are too much. They distract rather than frame. A UV/Haze filter ot maybe a polarizer would have helped bring out the mountains a bit more.
|
|
boaz65
Mar 5, 2004
02:03 GMT
|
If this is NATURAL beauty, then who needs post processing? Canada seems to have it all...GREAT BEER AND GREAT LANDSCAPES!
|
